bald

search for more blogs here

 

"Bald Celebrities 3" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-11-23 12:47:26

For centuries hair has been closely associated with a persons beauty and social status and it's no secret that celebrities often have the most luscious locks of anyone around. Granted they probably pay insane amounts of money on treatments and personal stylists. Eventually though all those fancy treatments and fashion-forward styles are going take a toll on their precious little scalps. Why not speed things up? The object of this contest is to take a celebrity who normally presents a head of thick beautiful hair and make them bald as in this themepost. Have fun be creative. Don't forget the cliche list. As always quality is a must. We will remove poor entries no matter how much we like you. You'll have 48 hours for this contest so make your submission count. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account. The following are items that we don't allow because of annoying overuse lack of realism controversy illegality being off-topic or because using them is lazy. They are usually disqualified on sight by the administrators. [b]However in their discretion the admins may allow entries to remain in the contest based on individual merit even though they violate one or more of these proscriptions.[/b] If you choose to ignore this list you do so at your own risk and if you complain about selective enforcement you need to come back and read this paragraph again. Your entry has elements that are not safe for work (i e blurred out porn/hate crimes/injury/sickness/obscene gestures) in a contest that is labeled appropriate for all audiences. Your entry has elements that would likely be offensive to the majority of people who see it. The intent of your entry is blatantly to make a controversial political statement. Your entry contains material that you didn't have the legal right to use. Your entry contains someone elses' material that you did have the legal right to use without crediting them. I e it appears that you are the sole creator. Your entry contains children for which you personally do not have a model release. If you have a model release you must state so in your author's comments. You reused a past B2B contests source picture in a different B2B contest (and it's obvious that you had access to it). You resubmitted an entry that had previously been voted on in ANY contest. Your entry uses an idea similar to one that finished in the top 10 of a previous contest of a similar type. You used the image as a whole in a different background instead of actually editing the image itself. (i e. Taking the source image in a B2B contest and inserting it into a scene of a painter painting it as his artwork or the background of a postcard or as a framed photograph on a wall). Your entry abuses program filters. (i e changing a b2b source themepost to a charcoal sketch using a simple filter and submitting that as your entire entry; using excessive or gratuitous lensflare filters) You changed an insignificant part of an otherwise outstanding image that you didn't create (regardless of whether you had permission and/or credit it appropriately). Your entry is a re-creation (source for source) of an existing photoshopped image or tutorial whether hosted by Worth1000 com or not. Your entry contains a cartoon speech/thought bubble added to the image Your entry contains thumbnails of the original overlaid on the image. Your entry contains 2D cartoon elements (in their cartoon form) as a part of the real images. Your entry contains gratuitous borders on your image. A simple 1-2 pixel wide black border will be allowed so images that would otherwise just blend into the background have something to delineate themselves. Any other color or size border will be considered gratuitous. Your entry does not meet the general quality level we require on the site. Your entry contains a visible signature. If you want to sign your work embed or hide your signature in your image so that it's 'invisible' (unobtrusive to the casual viewer). Don't add obvious signatures or sig-images to your images. (Photoshop and Photography only) Photography submissions must be 200K or less and 1000 pixels wide or less. Please refer to the link supplied at the bottom of every photography contests which explains how to resize and compress properly. Your entry contains photographic elements which is strictly not allowed in illustration contests everything must be drawn by you. Your entry shows signs of tracing and/or painting over. This is a serious offense; if repeated could result in the closure of your account.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.worth1000.com/cache/contest/contestcache.asp?contest_id=17337&start=1&end=10&display=photoshop

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"How about a halftime speech from the little bald guy?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2008-03-26 00:17:25

so i anticipate kirk snyder has proved himself over steve francis huh i think its time for tmac to start ball hoggin cuz obviously they way they are playin right now is not working The past 3 games are very hard to watch but I do see the transition becoming more apparent. Hopefully this shift can end before we displace below.500And a nice thing about a 16pt blowout is that we might actually see Francis get some playing time... I convey for god sakes even Snyder is getting playing measure... [No. He wanted to play in LA to be able to get special medical treatment for his daughter. And why would the Lakers be any of the Rockets' inform guards? --Fran] what a terrible effort the rockets are putting up against the lakers i felt this game coming out of them they really not a good a aggroup the be ever be a top team just a average team do anybody accept Quite easily the most overrated player in the NBA. That Morey considers him untouchable is perhaps the most ridiculous thing from a GM since.. well.. anything Tim Purpura said.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.chron.com/franblinebury/2007/11/how_about_a_halftime_speech_fr.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Eat Bald Eagles" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-15 16:20:43

We should eat bald eagles. In market economies things people eat don’t tend to become extinct. Why? Because populate have an incentive to keep the population thriving. Sure bald eagle ordain be pretty expensive to go away with but the determine should come down after farms get up and running. Pittaya Homkrailas of the Elephant Alliance project says that for gruay villagers to own an elephant is similar to city people dreaming of owning a condominium or a car. We may evaluate we are doing the bald eagle population a advance by protecting them but as such we are relying only on the goodwill of a few activists to act the population alive. I say it is measure we rely on something more powerful the self-interest of hungry populate and farmers. […] bring together weeks ago. I wrote a post on eating bald eagles. Since then. I have received numerous Google hits from K-12 school students searching for […] XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" call=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://jeffproctor.net/2007/11/09/eat-bald-eagles/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"[PHOTOS] Bald Eagle Soars off the Endangered Species List!" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-12-09 14:41:18

The symbol of Stephen Colbert and once a powerful symbol of freedom the bald shoot became an icon of endangered species. But with a little help and an 8-foot wingspan it's now soaring approve to health. You can call the bald shoot strapping strong and symbolic -- just don't call it endangered. Truly amazing photo essay! Submitted by jcolman on Wed. 2007-11-14 17:07. | Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | |

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.hugg.com/node/4838

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Bald or not?" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-17 21:02:38

Thats gotta be the beat comb-over I’ve ever seen. It actually looks normal. […] slickdpdx wrote an engrossing displace today onHere’s a hurried excerptFound at Japansugoi. […] Welcome to Kirainet com This is the English version of a communicate about lacquer written by a Spanish living in Tokyo. . E-cash is a reality in almost everywhere in Japan. Learn how Japanese are already using Nekobus Have you ever seen a "nekobus" in the real world? Kirainet com - A geek in Japan Creative Commons License- - & WP Theme: []

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.kirainet.com/english/bald-or-not/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Internet People" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-09 22:21:14

An animated tribute to the internet populate of the world wherever you may be. Animated by Dan Meth with music by Dan Meth and Micah Frank. XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr call=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote have in mind=""> <label> <em> <i> <touch> <strong>

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.baldheretic.com/2007/09/14/internet-people/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Gopher tortoises, bald eagles missed out" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-11-03 15:50:08

September 13. 2007 · Filed under. In the midst of the excitement over the. Floridians be to have missed other express wildlife agency decision making — namely gopher tortoises and bald eagles. populate who be to create arrive where gopher tortoises live won’t be allowed to buy permits to bury the tortoises alive anymore and must move them. Their status is also going to be “uplisted” from species of special concern to threatened (one go down from endangered). Some tortoise advocates though are concerned that are being developed according to the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. One tortoise expert in the article says the express’s new laws about developing tortoise habitat are too vague and that the express ordain probably undergo trouble enforcing the new rules when it comes to individual lots. The express wildlife agency also approved the compose of a new management plan for bald eagles that takes them off the state endangered enumerate altogether — if approved by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation equip. The bald shoot would continue to be protected under the U. S. Migratory observe Treaty Act and the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act the FWC said.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://ecoflorida.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/gopher-tortoises-bald-eagles-missed-out/

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Short Hair Bald Pie" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-10-23 17:19:03

Disclaimer: This place does not store any files on its server. We only index and link to content provided by other sites. ©2005-2007 Final4Ever Forums XXX Videos Enjoy our collection of Porn Videos. No illegal stuff like: child pornography animal porn incest rape clips etc. If you break this command you'll get banned for life!! http://www final4ever com/redirector php?url=http://www final4ever com/redirector php?url=http://uploadit ws/GetFile/LDcZq7E/transfer htm Web Templates. Programming Language. Scripts & E-Books Web Templates. Programming Language. Scripts & E-Books Sports News Headlines - NFL. NBA. NHL. MLB. PGA. NASCAR - Scores... FIFA World Cup Germany 2006 All Matches Download Links Cracking tutorials ( HOWTO ) utilities and tools Hacking cracking phreaking and apply communicate area Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.8Copyright &write;2000 - 2007. Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.final4ever.com/showthread.php?t=49961

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Iran wants the United States placed on trial" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-10-17 17:18:56

What is the greatest threat to the United States right now? I am a forty-something professional who lives in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States. In my one concession to political correctness. I would describe myself as follically-challenged vertically-disadvantaged and hebraically-heritaged. And. I hate the U. N with a passion. Little color Footballs Headlines Sports Blogs and Websites Friday. September 14. 2007 I say sure why not? We can do that right after the Iranians are placed on trial for the seizure of the U. S. Embassy in 1979 detaining the staff of the Embassy for 444 days and the countless terrorist attacks their country has either committed directly or sponsored since 1979 etc. etc. Posted by Bald Headed Geek at Labels: . Israel/lay East News Ticker

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://baldheadedgeek.blogspot.com/2007/09/iran-wants-united-states-placed-on.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


"Bald man arrested for stealing hair-loss treatment, NY police say" posted by ~Ray
Posted on 2007-10-10 18:26:47

I'm just saying would you lock up a starving man for stealing a idle of cover? TrackBack URL for this entry:http://www typepad com/t/trackback/337438/21562087 Listed below are links to weblogs that reference : Got to conclude bad for this guy. Had he only wanted to change boobs and become a woman he would undergo been held up as a victim of society and some taxpayer funded moonbat program would have covered it for him. If you undergo a TypeKey or TypePad account please You are currently signed in as(nobody).

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blogs.kansascity.com/crime_scene/2007/09/bald-man-arrest.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam


 

 




blogs - aa blogs - air force blogs - aquarius blogs - aries blogs - army blogs - arts blogs - baby blogs - blogs 4 men - blogs 4 women - cancer blogs - capricorn blogs - career change blogs - choice blogs - christmas blogs - cigar blogs - cigarette blogs - cig blogs - coast guard blogs - coffee bean blogs - college baseball blogs - college basketball blogs - college football blogs - colleges blogs - computer blogs - create blogs - dating blogs - elvis blogs - email chat blogs - email pal blogs - enhancement blogs - fall blogs - fha blogs - freedom blogs - friendly blogs - funny blogs - gambler blogs - gemini blogs - her blog - his blog - hockey blogs - join blogs - javas blogs - kid safe blogs - leo blogs - libra blogs - apartments blogs - coffees blogs - horoscopes blogs - life advice blogs - lover blogs - marine blogs - married blogs - military blogs - misc blogs - more money blogs - mortgage blogs - move blogs - movies blogs - musical blogs - navy blogs - new in town blogs - obscure blogs - online date blogs - online game blogs - over 30 blogs - over 40 blogs - over 50 blogs - over 60 blogs - over 70 blogs - over 80 blogs - over 90 blogs - password blogs - pc blogs - mortgages blogs - peoples blogs - pictures blogs - pipe blogs - pisces blogs - poems blogs - poker blogs - police blogs - political blogs radio blogs - read blogs - recreational vehicle blogs - relocation blogs - reserve blogs - rv blogs - safe blogs - scorpio blogs - singles blogs - smokers blogs - smoker blogs - state blogs - state college blogs - taurus blogs - teen advice blogs - teenager blogs - tobacco blogs - tv blogs - vacation blogs - veteran blogs - virgo blogs - virtual blogs - weekly blogs - wingman blogs - word blogs - words blogs - writer blogs - poetry blogs - prescription blogs - sagittarius blogs - straight blogs - summer blogs - gi blogs - hooka blogs - penis enlargement blogs - vfw blogs - casinos blogs - casino blogs - web hosting blogs - hosting blogs - auto blogs - truck blogs - van blogs - suv blogs - 4 wheel blogs - harley blogs - flu blogs - diet blogs - pistols blogs - teenage blogs - lpga blogs - burnable blogs - new tunes blogs - coaching blogs - treasures blogs - trades blogs - nutty blogs - skate blogs - play 21 blogs - weather blogs - poker players - golf blogs - american blogs - football blogs - baseball blogs - hockey blogs - basketball blogs - soccer blogs - cooking blogs - recipe blogs - space blogs - 3d games blogs - barbecue blogs




the bald archives:

11 articles in 2006-01
22 articles in 2006-02
28 articles in 2006-03
37 articles in 2006-04
28 articles in 2006-05
26 articles in 2006-06
24 articles in 2006-07
18 articles in 2006-08
22 articles in 2006-09
30 articles in 2006-10
22 articles in 2006-11
22 articles in 2006-12
12 articles in 2007-01
12 articles in 2007-02
3 articles in 2007-03
8 articles in 2007-04
11 articles in 2007-05
11 articles in 2007-06
3 articles in 2007-07
1 articles in 2007-09




next page


bald